Graduate School Alliance for Executive
Coaching
Guidelines for Graduate Academic Programs in Executive Coaching
Introduction
The following guidelines are
intended primarily for graduate academic programs, certificate or degree
granting, specifically in executive and organizational coaching.
Graduate academic institutions
who are developing or offering individual courses in this field may also find
the guidelines useful. We define executive and organizational coaching as a
development process that builds a leader’s capabilities to achieve professional
and organizational goals. A leader is an individual who has the potential of
making a significant contribution to the mission and purpose of the
organization. This coaching is conducted through one-on-one and group
interactions, driven by evidence/data from multiple perspectives, and is based
on mutual trust and respect. The coach, individuals being coached, and their
organizations work in partnership to help achieve the agreed upon goals of the
coaching.
Our objectives for the
distribution of these guidelines are:
-
to begin to establish
standards for the graduate academic education of executive and
organizational coaching;
-
to test an initial set of
standards within graduate academic institutions;
-
to begin a dialogue with
graduate academicians and their institutions around the world;
-
to prepare for the
development and implementation of an accreditation process for graduate
programs in this field.
Assumptions
Graduate School offerings in
Executive Coaching are diverse. Within the Graduate School Alliance for
Executive Coaching, current and planned programs range from individual courses
and continuing education programs, to coaching concentrations within more
general certificate or degree programs, to full certificate or degree programs
focused solely on Executive Coaching. Some programs are built upon a specific
theoretical or applied model while others are eclectic, covering a wide range of
theories and methods.
There are programs which
primarily utilize live, face-to-face classroom study and practicum supervision
and others which are partially or completely reliant on distant-learning formats
through electronic media and networks. And finally, some programs are housed in
business schools, others in schools of education, professional schools of
psychology or psychology departments, through multi-disciplinary collaborations,
or in other school divisions.
The following guidelines and
recommendations have been established to reflect and respect the diversity of
Executive Coaching programs and the potential value of them all when they are
well constructed and managed. These guidelines and recommendations are intended
to assist institutions and faculty in developing executive coaching education
and training programs that will provide high-quality education consistent with
other professional education and training programs within academia.
The guidelines do not require
specific content or numbers of hours of coursework, individual study, or
supervised application. They do, however, recommend that those standards be
established and managed carefully for any particular program. In addition, where
applicable, the guidelines include examples of best practices for comprehensive
programs in this field where established in academic programs in executive
coaching.
Guidelines for Graduate
Academic Programs in Executive Coaching
Each of the following
guidelines are presented as a recommended minimum standard for graduate
executive coaching programs.
1.
Program mission and objectives – The program’s stated purpose and goals.
1.1. An
explicit focus on executive and leadership coaching activities and skills as
opposed to other forms of coaching is explicitly stated in materials.
2. Program context –Linkages exist between the program and its host
institution; alignment of program goals with the goals of the host institution.
2.1. The
program is housed within a regionally accredited host institution.
2.2. The
program is managed by members of the host academic institution rather than
existing outside the host institution.
3. Requirements for admission (student qualifications) – Student
prerequisites for admission to the course and alignment of student
qualifications with curriculum and goals.
3.1. For
programs or courses of study, application guidelines are made explicit. For
courses, there is a clear statement of any prerequisites for enrollment in the
course.
3.1.1. Programs require a minimum of an undergraduate degree before
graduate study and explicitly state other requirements for entry into programs
(e.g., statements of purpose, etc.)
3.2.
Programs and/or individual courses have equal opportunity access to the program
on the part of applicants.
3.3.
Institutions providing coach education and training through coursework or formal
courses of study state their nondiscrimination standards and practices in
admissions.
4. Curriculum and training plan – The program’s specific curriculum,
including both classroom and field based learning activities, and the alignment
of the curriculum with the program’s goals and the students’ admission
qualifications.
4.1. A
statement of the competencies developed through participation in the program is
outlined.
4.2. The
curriculum and related requirements are delineated.
4.3.
Evidence is apparent that the curriculum is appropriate to the practice of
executive coaching, i.e. that there is a substantial focus on the coachee, role,
organization and coach system.
4.4.
Approximate demands on students (work hours) are delineated.
4.5.
Activities to assess student learning are made explicit and implemented.
4.6. The
curriculum is developed at the graduate level.
4.7.
Where part of the curriculum is online, delineation of face to face
instructional time is described.
4.8.
Multi-disciplinary and eclectic instruction and coursework are present.
4.9. The
principles of adult learning are utilized in the coursework and/or program.
4.10.
Educational activities and outcomes for individual students and the programs are
documented.
For academic graduate
programs in executive coaching, it is recommended that curricular content cover
the following 5 areas:
-
Theory & Knowledge
-
Business Acumen
-
Coaching Skills
-
The Coaching Process
-
Professional Practice
Theory & Knowledge Areas
- Familiarity with and understanding of applicable theories and bodies of
knowledge:
Includes a basic understanding
of:
-
Individual differences and
development
-
Interpersonal dynamics and
communication
-
Group and inter-group
dynamics
-
Organizational systems and
dynamics
-
Social systems and dynamics
-
Change management
-
Adult learning
-
Coaching theory and
principles
Business Acumen
– An understanding of the basic business functions and how they work together to
achieve business goals or the organization’s mission in the case of
mission-driven organizations.
Includes a basic understanding
of:
Coaching Skills-Understanding
of and competence in using the following skills in a number of areas:
Interviewing
-
Skills of interaction
(examples below)
-
Feedback
-
Listening
-
Questioning
-
Action planning
-
Constructive confrontation
-
Challenging
-
Negotiating
-
Contracting
-
Influencing
-
Encouragement/support
-
Skills of facilitation
(examples below)
-
Visualization
-
Guiding action and
reflection
-
Skills of education and
change management (examples below):
-
Behavior modeling
-
Behavior modification
-
Reinforcement
-
Conflict management
-
Skills of utilization: of
self, of the coaching relationship
-
Rapport building
-
Self-awareness
The Process of Coaching-An
understanding of the process of coaching in which various skills, tools,
interventions, etc. are used:
Including:
Professional Practice-An
understanding of important frameworks for practicing at a professional level:
Including:
5. Requirements for supervised experience – Supervised coaching experiences
during training and their linkages with the curriculum are present.
5.1.
Goals of required supervised coaching experiences are delineated.
5.2. The
number of coaching cases required, the nature of those cases, the length of
those cases and other relevant concerns are clearly noted.
5.3. A
clear statement regarding the ethical obligations of all participants in the
program’s field based learning activities is recommended.
5.4.
Assessment of student learning from field based activities is a regular and
ongoing part of the program or coursework.
Guidelines for Graduate
Academic Programs in Executive Coaching
(continued)
Minimum hours for Content Instruction:
Graduate
Certificate- 120 hours
Masters
Degree- 180 hours
Minimum hours for Skill Development:
Graduate
Certificate- 36 hours
Masters
Degree- 36 hours
Minimum hours for Supervised Practicum (peer, faculty and group):
Graduate
Certificate: Client Coaching- 15 hours; Supervision- 25 hours
Masters
Degree: Client Coaching- 50 hours; Supervision- 60 hours
6. Requirements for the assessment of students’ progress and readiness for
individual certification for the practice of executive coaching.
6.1.
Requirements for the assessment of students’ readiness for the practice of
executive coaching are stated.
6.2. A
methodology for assessing students’ progress toward meeting certification
requirements is stated and part of a graduate course of study.
7. Program values and ethical standards – The alignment of program and host
institution values and the management of ethical issues.
7.1.
Ethical practice and conduct guidelines are delineated for all parties.
7.2.
Professional standards are embedded in the program and explicitly part of the
course of study.
7.3.
Guidelines for the management of confidential relationship and coaching
boundaries are specifically covered.
8. Program administration and resources – Program leadership, the
qualifications of program leadership, program financial structure, program
business model and fees, program space, program materials and program support
from host institution.
8.1.
Specification of requirements for program administrator role.
8.2. Fee
structure.
8.3.
Budget.
8.4.
Instructional and other space/physical facilities requirements.
8.5.
Student financial aide.
8.6.
Student, faculty and program materials (including internet) security.
9. Engagement with cultural and individual differences and diversity –
Incorporation into the curriculum and supervised coaching activities awareness
of and engagement with personal and cultural diversity including diversity
related to ethnicity, race, gender, age, sexual orientation and other identity
group memberships that may impact individual program students, leaders, faculty,
supervisors and society at large.
9.1.
Evidence of diversity in admissions, curriculum, faculty, supervisors and field
based learning opportunities is recommended.
9.2.
Curriculum efforts to prepare students for executive coaching in a diverse world
are clearly articulated.
10.
Faculty and supervisory qualifications and supervision – The specification and
assessment of faculty and supervisory competencies, backgrounds and academic
qualifications as appropriate.
10.1.
The qualifications required of faculty and supervisors are specified.
10.2.
Records of faculty and supervisory activities and resumes are kept.
10.3.
Records of faculty and supervisor compensation are maintained.
10.4.
Supervision of faculty and supervisors is provided by the host institution in
accordance with academic standards.
10.5.
Continued development and education is required of faculty and supervisors.
11.
Student, faculty, administration, supervisor relations – Communications and
feedback channels between and among program students, administration, faculty,
supervisors and those organizations making use of coaching provided by program
students.
11.1.
Delineation of appropriate role relationships and the nature of role conflicts
between supervisors, students, faculty and administrators are in place and
supported.
11.2.
Appeals and complaints processes are delineated for students, faculty,
supervisors and administrators.
11.3.
Communications activities that support good relationships among students,
faculty, supervisors and administrators are in place.
12.
Program assessment and quality enhancement – The measurement of learning
outcomes against program objectives and the feedback of such assessment
activities with the intention of improving program performance.
12.1.
The existence and activities of a quality assurance program are highly
recommended.
12.2.
Demonstration of assessment activities that are linked to the competencies
delineated in the program goals are in place.
12.3.
Mechanisms for the use of quality assurance data for program improvements have
been identified and implemented.
13.
Policies regarding advertising and stating of claims
13.1.
Standards for advertising the program and recruiting students, faculty,
supervisors or other stakeholders to the program’s activities are consistent
with academic values.
14.
Contributions to the development of and use of new knowledge in the field of
executive coaching – Research and the dissemination of research that can promote
the improvement of practice in the field of executive coaching.
14.1.
Research activities are valued and recommended as integral to the development of
academic coaching programs.
14.2.
Use of research in the curriculum is explicit.
15.
Relationship with the accrediting body
15.1. Liaison between the
program, its host institution and the accrediting body.
15.2. The management of required
communications and record keeping.
15.3. Self-assessment of
potential conflicts of interest and reporting requirements.
|